well i dindt know it in the first place. So thx,.. its a cool Image
(but a reference to the original, if it's not yours wouldnt be bad)
It's not like the user wrote, "By: Me, Idea: Me, Owner: Me....etc". Beside the fact, even if the original owner would had put a watermark or copyright statement on the work, an amateur photoshop user could easily clone the palette and then modify PFP properties of the photo, so the photo can be without watermark, and be untraceable through any reverse-search photo methods.
not like like the guy who post it wrote "owner:me"? MAYBE cause point of deviantART is that everyone has their own acc and to post their own work, so there is no need for that therefore, this was wrong. I dont care if you wouldnt see it, if this guy didnt repost it. i really dont. and trust me noone does. especially not the real owner of the art.
this guy didnt even give a credit to orginal owner. ye i know, you just said ANOTHER wrong attitude "maybe he couldnt find the root of orginal artist" then dont freaking post it, again. who the heck are you to post someone else's art and act (YES HE DOES ACT LIKE IT'S HIS. END OF STORY.) ? he didint even wrote "I found this on random site, dont know the owner".
I was looking forward for opinions, rather than a rereading of the rules.
...Although he didn't manually put that copyright, it was already there.
Regardless if there's a watermark or not. It doesn't matter that the person that posted it didn't put that they made it. A while back someone stole a picture from me without permission (i hadn't used water marks back then.) And they too didn't put any description saying it was theirs. It STILL classifies as stealing no matter what.
If you wanna post art and photos that aren't yours and not get in trouble for it, go to Photobucket.
So in that logic, it is only right when society believes right, which may or may not take years for the belief to change. It is wrong and prohibited in some places to go nude on the public, it is in the rules and society believes is wrong as well, but logically it is just human nature and it's not wrong. So if DA states those rules, those are only the opinions that are today, and isn't based on rationality.
Self-Importance and feeding our own narcissistic needs, is what we may be robbed from. If the issue was him selling the piece, then I'll agree with you.
While I agree it is wrong to claim an art piece as your own, and make money out of it, I disagree with the method of doing it in the internet where you can expect people to steal it.
It does not matter if he didn't claim this work as his own. This is not YOUR site or HIS site. When you joined the site you agreed to the rules of the site. There are plenty of other sites that allow you to upload anything you want. If you don't want to respect the site rules, get out. Or go make your own site?
If your just going to respond with the opinion of a site and brown-nose their rules, instead of thinking for yourself and responding with your own opinion, then don't bother responding at all. The comment is just as worthless as the author.
If I didn't agree with them, I wouldn't have said anything. Duh.
My opinion: follow their rules. Is that really hard for you to follow? ;D
I was looking forward to opinions, rather than users blatantly posting the rules of DA. Perhaps or more likely, it was my poor rewording; I am always terribly ill when it comes to writing. Besides, it's not like my opinion that is 1 out of who knows how many, is going to change everything.
It was my terrible attempt at being an optimist, turns out I am better going the opposing direction.
There are plenty of sites that allow you to share any art you please:
and many forum based sites.
I'm sorry that I acted hostile towards you, my wording was a bit harsh, but I stand by my initial opinion. Always remember: you don't have to be apart of this site. If you agreed to the TOS when you joined, it is your responsibility.
Perhaps you could make a topic about making a separate part of DeviantArt for sharing artworks that don't belong to you, in the attempt to appreciate them.
when he said nothing, that automatically made him shady...when you have nothing to hide, you hide nothing. SHOW THE NAME OF THE ORIGINAL ARTIST, get his permission and blah....